For Artificial Humor we'd need to add a confidence matrix of
   expectations. - with different layers of certainties.

   Humor isn't hard to decode. It's changing context on several
   levels simultaneously. Some we expect, which makes it funny
   (fits pattern-of-funny, and the laugh typically comes after a
   certain set of parameters are met, which requires timing) and
   then there is the unexpected change of context, where we are in
   a safe environment and the context / world frame change isn't
   deadly.

   Safe/unsafe - that's another level that needs to be added to the
   confidence.

   In an unsafe environment, unless one has cognitive differences,
   "THIS ISN'T FUNNY!" is a common response; yet then so is
   laughter... it "lightens the mood" because one laughs at the
   cognitive dissonance to help reconcile it (laughing your way
   into acceptance) - turning the XOR into an == as it were.

   Anyway, I can visualize the humor program sending and receiving
   in pseudo-code in my head but I'm sure somebody else has drawn
   it out, labelled it, has humor programs that can comprehend
   jokes already.

   If they don't, they will, because if I can see it, I'm sure
   somebody else 'out there' has too, or will