I think agreement is over-rated as a criteria of truth. The
   spaces inbetween conflict are where the little ponds of truth
   lie.

   cognitively, belief comes from a push from the amygdala. It is
   the pimary drive of reason. Reasoning *can* back-influence
   belief, but at a slower, thinner, more fragile pace. Takes
   training.

   At the same time, we're more than our brains. Plus, I see most
   things as fundamentally synonymous in some fashion. So, I can
   say "yes", "no", "I don't know", depending on the screening I
   put over the frame and how the light is hitting the object in
   question.

   So, I'll say "Yes".