_____ __________ ______ / ___// ____/ __ \/ ____/______ ______ ___ ____ \__ \/ __/ / / / / / __/ ___/ / / / __ `__ \/ __ \ ___/ / /___/ /_/ / /_/ / / / /_/ / / / / / / /_/ / /____/_____/\____/\____/_/ \__,_/_/ /_/ /_/ .___/ /_/ ╭⋟─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ | | | TITLE: I'm So Sick of Google | | | | DATE: May 26, 2025 | | | | AUTHOR: grump@seogrump.com | | | ╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────⋞╯ It's been interesting to watch how Google has changed over the past couple of decades. Remember when their unofficial corporate mantra was supposedly "Don't be evil?" Well, it's been quite obvious for some time that those days are gone. There were already accusations suggesting that Google was intentionally making search results worse to make people click "Back" and view more ads. Now that we're in the AI age, though, I feel like the experience of using the Google search engine is objectively bad a large part of the time. I can always switch to a different search engine, of course, but it's kind of difficult in my line of work because my clients aren't exactly trying to rank on Kagi. I need to be where their potential customers are. One thing I've noticed over the past couple of weeks, though, is that the AI overviews on Google are getting absolutely unbearable. It feels like Google is trying to provide an AI summary for almost every query, even when the AI has nothing useful to say about your search. The overview fills almost a page of screen real estate with information that you often didn't request and provides no value whatsoever. Case in point: the "site:" operator. When you use that operator, you're specifically saying, "just show me results from this site." Even then, the "helpful" AI pops in with a message like "The search '(search term) site:(website)' indicates a desire to find information about (search term) on (website)..." I got the absolute worst AI overview for a search with the "site:" operator just a few days ago. Google actually said something along the lines of, "(Website) isn't an authoritative source of information about (Topic). Here's a summary of information found on other sites." I totally get that sometimes the AI overviews are useful. Overall, though, I feel like the experience of using Google hasn't been this bad since the days when eHow ranked for every query. It's also quite obvious that Google has no concern about the long-term health of the web and is simply trying to maximize their financial returns while they can. Stealing and repurposing content without compensating the creators can only have one long-term outcome. People will eventually stop creating. There will at some point be little left on the web other than AI content, e-commerce sites, brand sites and social media. After that, AI models will mostly get trained on their own content. Once it gets to that point -- who knows? Google certainly doesn't have a plan. None of the AI companies do. It would be very nice if more people would try other search engines and force Google to do better. I was very tickled to find one of my recent posts [1] mentioned on a gopherhole that I enjoy reading [2]. Gopher seems to be a very small place indeed. It hadn't occurred to me that those who operate their own gopher servers would certainly know if they were being crawled by AI scrapers. It's good to know that this particular corner of the Internet probably hasn't been invaded yet. [1] gopher://sdf.org:70/0/users/seogrump/phlog/20250514-llms-and-gopher.txt [2] gopher://gopher.unixlore.net:70/0/glog/gopher-and-ai-bots.md ╰─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────⋞╯