[1]Summary: The Supreme Court Rules in Carpenter v. United States:

     On Friday, June 22, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated
     opinion in Carpenter v. United States, holding that a warrant is
     required for police to access cell site location information from a
     cell phone company-the detailed geolocation information generated by
     a cellphone's communication with cell towers. As [2]predicted, Chief
     Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, reversing the Sixth
     Circuit's [3]decision. He was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer,
     Sotomayor and Kagan. The remaining four justices, Justices Kennedy,
     Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch each filed separate dissenting opinions.

   (Via [4]Lawfare - Hard National Security Choices)

   There has been a ton of coverage about this in the US. As per usual,
   Lawfare does a great job of reviewing this without hyperbole. Give it a
   good read as it has far reaching potential implications.
   Also on:

   [5]Twitter
     __________________________________________________________________

   My original entry is here: [6]Summary: The Supreme Court Rules in
   Carpenter v. United States. It posted Wed, 27 Jun 2018 02:28:23 +0000.
   Filed under: business, privacy, tech,

References

   1. https://www.lawfareblog.com/summary-supreme-court-rules-carpenter-v-united-states
   2. http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/06/interim-stat-pack-for-october-term-2017-and-key-takeaways/
   3. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14626167511079628834
   4. https://www.lawfareblog.com/recent
   5. https://twitter.com/TokyoGringo/status/1011799571121496066
   6. https://www.prjorgensen.com/?p=1237