title: Re: Working pre-medium and in-medium date: Sat Jun 27 2026 # Re: Working pre-medium and in-medium gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~drupe/phlog/260622_working_pre-medium_and_in-medium.txt Like drupe, I've also spent some time going back to writing things by hand, and for lots of the same reasons. For me, I became wary of how writing at a keyboard made me think, and how it was different to how I thought when I was writing longhand. I think that writing by hand, by its sheer slowness, allows space for you to consider more ways a sentence might continue after you finish the word you are writing. But, drupe says he has started writing phlog posts by hand--I don't think these things are worth spending the time on. There are, of course, many more stages to the writing process. If you are sitting down to something serious, like a novel or screenplay, and you are going to do it by hand, I think it probably works something like this for lots of people: 1. Ideation: mind maps on plain paper, tear-off pads 2. Organising: taking those ideas, putting each one on an index card and putting those cards in order. 3. Pre-rough draft: writing a 'treatment', fleshing out the cards into something that more concretely says "and then this specific thing happens", rather than "something like this happens next" 4. First draft: take your treatment and write it in the medium you are aiming for. For example, if you are writing a film, this is the first time you write "INT. A DARK ALLEY - NIGHT" and write real dialogue. This should be longhand. 5. Re-drafting: at some point you get this stuff to a computer. I think this should be held off as long as possible. If you write on a pad with tear-off pages you can make lots of edits and rewrite sections before it becomes truly unmanageable. When you think "I really need a clean, printed copy of this to get further" you'll know it is time to type it up, print it, and then carry on editing.