A couple lines about anarcho-liberalism

Forget everything you've read about anarcho-liberalism,
because it's probably a lie made up by the communist media.
Anarchism is not a theory of the power vacuum. Anarcho
liberalism is the mutual recognition of rights and freedoms,
as well as forms of organization of society. In other words,
a concept that recognizes the right of people to self-organize
on a voluntary and equal rights basis.
When communists write that the world system is capitalist,
they are lying. The world system is not capitalist, it is a system
of centralized and not very political regimes. In other words,
the mechanism of despotic and totalitarian hierarchical
structures what endowed with resources and power. That
is why all savages without states live in peace, and all
"civilized" nations wage wars for resources.
There is no more hypocritical subject on our planet than
the state. The reason for all wars and crimes is precisely the
apparatus of the state. A machine of will suppression consisting
of people with distorted and damaged psyche (professional
deformation). It is the state that breaks the will of the ordinary
man in early childhood, by imposing hypocritical laws
of behavior and the monopoly yoke of state institutions.
It's no secret that laws are determined by the values of the moral
market. Thus, your government can simultaneously require you
not park your car on the lawn and at the same time sell weapons,
drugs and engage in mass murder, somewhere in Africa.
Because the interests of parasitic institutions are always above
the interests of individual humans. The bureaucratic machine
is only interested in maintaining its existence and well-being.
At any cost and by any means.
But if the state is just a form of organization of social relations,
then who decided that the state is an inevitability? After all,
ordinary people are tamed and domesticated to lose their will
in awe previously to Moloch consisting of the labyrinths
of omnipotent institutions. That's all. All those magical clerks,
policemen, military men, judges, prosecutors, bureaucrats,
parliamentarians, agents, politicians, and so on. Casting their
spells to the surface of perception of the physical world. All
these biorobotic accomplices of the schizophrenic hallucinatory
machine of a mass insane psychosis. Who works with imaginary
magical terms that do not exist in reality. A masquerade
of voluntary dementia caused by the delirium media disguised
in a sadomasochistic form for role-playing games, suffering from
feelings of sexual inferiority, or constipation of the rectum
of bureaucratic people.
How did it happen that people-automans obtrude one's their
will to masses? Today it is already obvious that the "great silent
majority" endowed it with money, weapons and their indifference
to how the Babbitry prosperity is achieved. The rotten semblance
of life rotating around obsessive-compulsive disorders in relation
to goods and services. Under the image social progress.
The state apparatus is psychopathic in nature. He comes up with
imaginary rules and demands their strict acceptance by everyone,
who was born in this territory. Otherwise, you will be destroyed
or isolated. In order not to destroy this imaginary idyll
of a collective delirium. Simulating of the surrogate of life
in smartphones. And justifying any crimes by universal well-being.
Indeed, the spineless bureaucrats of voluntarism will gladly rid
themselves of you if you allow anything into your veins except
experimental genetic drugs that could kill you. Because, one way
or another, your body and your veins belong to the state. Everything
is weighed, measured, and stipulated in endless circulars drowning
in the paperwork of anonymous opportunistic clerks. The absurdity
of the existence of the state lies in the fact that the bureaucratic
apparatus creates problems that it then bravely attempts to solve.
Pure and untainted hallucinatory nonsense.
Modern communist propagandists have largely borrowed their
rhetoric from anarchists. As a result, many people sincerely accept
their leftist agenda. However, this is a mistake. Class warfare has
not disappeared; it continues. Today, the class divide exists
between the state apparatus and its accomplices, and the common
people.
These owning classes - bankers, corporate interests, globalists,
and institutionalists - are the enemies of all free and educated
individuals who are fighting against the dystopian centralization
disguised as "communist humanism." In simple terms, class conflict
arises from the forced exploitation of one person by another.
It does not depend on where you work or any other factor.
If everything occurs voluntarily and on equal terms, then class
conflict does not exist. Thus, hierarchical monopoly structures
are the root cause of social class tension in a broad sense.
The system of exploitation, as you understand, has not
disappeared. The growth of wealth and influence for some leads
to the discrimination of others. In our case, this discrimination
occurs through means of communication. Therefore, no matter
how leftist slogans globalists use in their rhetoric, the truth
is that these anonymous institutions, IT cartels, and international
organizations were not elected by anyone. Their power is not
derived from the will of the people. Their existence stems from
the financial interests of major tycoons and players in the bloody
business. So, think about this the next time you consider paying
taxes. Most likely, your money will be spent on anything but truly
useful things, as has happened in the United States. Your taxes
are a part of your labor. It is not entirely clear why anonymous
bureaucracy forcibly exploits your labor for its own interests.
You are not slave!
The psychopathic public opinion unconsciously defines what
is considered normal and what is not. While the declared norm
is not adhered to by anyone, there is a pretense that it is
mandatory. This results in a double hypocrisy of the state
machinery. In many communist countries around the world,
paradoxically unnatural laws have been enacted. For example,
laws regarding permissible self-defense, the prohibition
of prostitution, the ban on the right to own and carry firearms,
the prohibition of illegal entrepreneurial activities, the ban on
possession and use of certain substances, the prohibition of public
religious prayers, the ban on refusal of vaccination, the ban
on polygamy or polyandry, refusal of conscription, compulsory
education, and so on. Each of these so-called "progressive" crimes
is not criminal in nature. They are purely violations of personal
rights and freedoms regarding the use of one's body and life
by state enforcers. If there are no victims and no harm, then there
is no crime. This simple thesis distinguishes the legality of the
state from the understandable anarcho-liberal nature of natural
social relationships.
Another significant issue with the state apparatus is its monopoly
on the use of violence. If state laws primarily carry a moral
political undertone established by the ruling classes to serve their
interests, then it follows that many of those in prisons are largely
innocent individuals. It is evident that if we exclude all so-called
crimes where there are no victims or where the harm is absent
or minimal, we would conclude that the prison system exists
solely for the profit of unscrupulous hunting beaters of paternalism.
In other words, this is a classic system of exploitation, similar
to the tax system. Thus, despite contemporary communists claims
about the alleged irrelevance of class conflict, which they suggest
has been replaced by racial and gender issues, we have nonetheless
identified two of the most obvious elements of exploitation within
a centralized state. In other words, elites exploit the masses simply
because they possess money and weapons.
It thus becomes evident that if the people possess as much weaponry
and resources as these lackeys of the bankers, then bourgeois laws
will cease to be effective. The fetishism of form, all those shiny
badges, leather bondage, and circular orders, will merely reflect
the inclination of certain types of people towards role-playing
sadomasochistic games.
In other words, we arrive at the understanding of each individual
as a separate independent state. A person-state, if you will. After
all, if mad robots can arm themselves and unite into bureaucratized
gangs, then why can't each individual declare themselves a state
and confront this criminal global system? It seems quite obvious
to me. This is the answer to communist centralization. The concept
of anarchism leads to true social freedom. Communists, who have
stolen anarchist rhetoric, are leading people into an anonymous
prison. And that is not progress. This is why communists have
so despised anarchism since the mid-19th century.