The Case About Telepathy: Final Report Part 2 Table of contents: 1. Preface 2. Classification 3. Biological Telepathy 4. Conclusions 1. Preface Friends, allow me, as a researcher immersed in the mysteries of ancient civilizations and the enigma of human potential, to continue expressing my position regarding the phenomenon known as telepathy. Official science, with its conservative skepticism, is quick to dismiss it as insignificant, citing a lack of sufficient conclusive experimental evidence. However, I assert: this is nothing more than blindness, a reluctance to acknowledge that our ancestors may have possessed knowledge that our so-called "modern" science is only beginning to approach. 2. Classification But let us delineate the fields. I am not speaking of the mystical "voice in the head." I refer to a complex psychophysiological phenomenon rooted in the biological foundations of life. Recall flocks of birds or schools of fish changing direction in perfect synchrony, as if guided by a single will. This is not magic but the reality of biological synchronization, based on ultra-fast responses to barely perceptible visual or vibrational signals. Humans, having lost the acuity of these senses in civilized society, have retained their potential deep within the psyche. Take, for example, legendary Soviet stage performers such as Wolf Messing. His performances, where he demonstrated mind -reading, amazed thousands of spectators. He performed complex tasks, mentally transmitted from the audience, found hidden objects, read written words. Science explains this phenomenon as the "Clever Hans" effect - an unconscious muscular cue. Yes, this is partly probable. In my own modest experiments in field conditions outdoors, I managed to reproduce something similar with a group of tourists. Using a system of subtle signals - faint movements, glances, by mutual agreement - I was able to direct my created "telepath" toward the imagined object or word in a book. But does this exhaust the depth of the phenomenon? Experiments with hypnosis conducted in the USSR in the 1980s at a hospital in Novosibirsk revealed something different. A hypnotized patient, not seeing the number on a folded piece of paper held by the hypnotist, correctly identified it. I have written about this before and do not wish to repeat myself. When the feedback channels - visual control of the patient's hand movement - were interrupted by a sheet, the result disappeared. Isn't this proof that a connection exists, but it is not through some mystical channel, rather through those very, still not fully understood by science, non-verbal, subconscious signals? We are merely opening the door to a vast hall of knowledge about the human psyche. What about spiritist seances or a spirit board? Seemingly pure mystification. But laboratory experiments showed that the movement of the planchette is not at the will of spirits but results from involuntary micro-movements of the participants' hands. And surprisingly, it can point to letters forming meaningful answers - even when only one person present, who does not touch the planchette, knows the correct answer! Their involuntary reactions, facial expressions, breathing are unconsciously read by others and translated into movement. Isn't this a form of communication - a kind of collective subconscious, a protocol our civilization has yet to decode? And here we arrive at the main point. All these examples - spirit boards, hypnosis, the work of a stage "telepath" - demonstrate not a channel for transmitting thoughts, but a channel for receiving and processing information that we typically do not notice. Our brain is a brilliant analyzer of micro-signals: breathing frequencies, slight facial muscle tension, eye glints, changes in heart rhythm. In states of heightened concentration or hypnotic trance, this analyzer reaches an incredible level of sensitivity. What we call "reading thoughts" is often actually "reading the person" as a whole, including all involuntary reactions. Only a few can do this. But those who truly can possess unlimited power. Think about it! 3. Biological Telepathy But that is not all. There exists a domain that science is only beginning to explore - direct biological connection at the level of synchronization of internal biological rhythms. There are cases where, among twins or people who have lived together for a long time, menstrual cycles synchronize, similar dreams occur, or an unexplainable sense of alarm arises simultaneously during a danger to the other. This is not telepathy in the sci-fi sense but a consequence of deep biological and emotional tuning - possibly mediated by pheromones, infrasound, or weak electromagnetic fields of living organisms or neurons. We are complex bioelectric systems, and our "field" interactions are not mysticism but a hypothesis requiring serious investigation. Consider the animal kingdom. Migratory birds crossing thousands of kilometers without maps or compasses; homing pigeons finding their way home precisely; salmon returning to spawn in their native rivers. Science offers hypotheses about magnetic or astronomical navigation. But are these explanations complete? Experiments with ants conducted by Soviet scientist Raisa Matveevna Kaul over more than ten years convincingly demonstrated that these tiny creatures use tree tops for navigation - creating a visual map of their environment within their microscopic brains! They solve a problem that modern engineers struggle with - correlation - based extreme navigation. If ants developed such instincts over millions of years of evolution, what could humans achieve in this regard? Think about this next time you experience strange or inexplicable feelings. So where is the truth? As always, it lies somewhere in the middle. Telepathy as a direct, non-physical reading of words and images "from head to head" most likely does not exist. But telepathy as a collective term for a whole spectrum of real, yet extremely weak and poorly understood forms of biocommunication - undoubtedly is a reality. It is a delicate web of connections woven from remnants of our ancient animal senses, subconscious capabilities, and non - verbal intelligence. Ancient civilizations, living in greater harmony with nature, perhaps cultivated and developed these abilities, transforming them into an art that we now, with our instruments and logic, are only beginning to reconstruct. My own field studies of mosquitoes and horseflies have dispelled the widespread myth of their ability to sense prey from kilometers away. No, they find us only from a few meters, guided by heat and smell. But does this mean all secrets of the living world are uncovered? Absolutely not! It only means we must seek explanations not in mysticism but in complex, still unknown mechanisms of biocommunication. 4. Conclusions Yes, I am intrigued by bold claims about telepathy as a kind of direct mental radio. My many years of research, including attempts to activate a telepathic channel through pain induction using a "carrot and stick" method, have not yielded success. But I am convinced: what we call telepathy is a truly complex phenomenon. It includes perceiving ultra-weak physical signals, subtle reading of body language and subconscious cues, phenomenal memory, and the brain's capacity for incredible, as yet unexplained forms of connection. Denying this means denying the very possibility that ancient proto-civilizations of the Ice Age, whose traces I see worldwide, possessed knowledge lost to us. Perhaps their priests and initiates mastered the art of such communication perfectly. Our task is not to dismiss the phenomenon outright but to continue research with an open mind, utilizing the entire arsenal of modern science to unravel this greatest mystery of human potential. The truth is nearby, waiting for its Tesla!