Simply About American Communism In European media, I often see comments from experts - Americanists who cannot understand which communists the Republican administration in the White House is referring to. In my opinion, this is further evidence of the chasm between the American experience and that of the rest of the world. American communism is one of the branches of bourgeois Western communism. This ideology is built on a reinterpretation of Karl Marx's ideas, often referred to as "critical Marxist theory." The main ideologist of this concept was Herbert Marcuse, whose central idea was the abolition of private rights and their replacement with collective group rights as an alternative to class struggle, which Marcuse considered outdated and unresponsive to the realities of the time. Thus, Marcuseans replaced class conflict with sexual, religious, and racial conflicts. All of this was and is done with the aim of "pacifying existence" through the "normalization" of deviations. Marcuse's ultimate goal was the virtualization of human needs through their centralization. In other words, the construction of a "global family" where everyone would know everything about everyone, but it violating private rights and personal freedoms. Simply put, it resembles the life of prisoners in a Soviet Gulag barrack, where a virtual collective would suppress "incorrect" behavior from the perspective of the surrounding people. Another prominent figure in American communist ideology was Karl Popper, although he did not live in the U.S. In his works on the "Open Society," he praised Stalinist-type communism as well as the dictatorship of institutions what he termed institutional democracy. This is when anonymous bureaucrats affiliated with corporate bankers manage the state regardless of election outcomes. It is a kind of paternalism, albeit through softer methods. Using reinterpreted ideas from the communist Gramsci and cultural Italian Marxism in general, the concept of the "Open Society" was imposed as the only form of liberal democracy. A distinguishing feature of American communism, in general, is that almost all leftist organizations are funded by transnational banking capital (stock market speculators). This seems absurd to so-called orthodox communists: Maoists, Bolsheviks, Trotskyists, and so on. However, the reinterpreted American version of Marxism teaches that the best example of a planned economy is indeed investment banking corporations, which today are the main donors to American leftist movements. The political conduit of American communism is the Democratic Party of the United States, against which the current Republican administration of the White House stands. Like any communist party, the Democratic Party promotes the power of an anonymous bureaucracy, or what is often referred to as the "deep state." This is based on a set of "certain ideas" that transcend the electoral will of the voters. As global experience shows, it is the dictatorship of institutions that serves as the primary source of power for communists in all countries. This, in turn, leads to the growth of the state apparatus and taxes. Thus, the more bureaucratic agencies created by communists, the more taxes ordinary citizens must pay. As a result, the encroaching state begins to replace market relations, consuming the federal budget. In simpler terms, what could be a profitable venture under the authority of state institutions becomes subsidized. Consequently, bankers and corporations that finance the "leftist agenda" receive contracts to service government bureaucratic institutions and their programs. Therefore, when the Republican administration of the White House disbands certain ministries or agencies, it does so solely to create new markets. In fact, this is a form of radical market reform. The main conflict between communists and Republicans lies in the realm of individual rights and freedoms. American communists deny individual rights and freedoms, believing only in collective and group rights. For example, they advocate for the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, racial minorities, religious minorities, indigenous peoples, and so on. This is referred to as inclusivity. The primary culprits for the violation of collective rights, according to communists, are white heterosexual men and Christians. However, this communist idea is fundamentally illogical, as the smallest minority of all is indeed each individual person. But other American communist theories are based on this idea. The heory of global warming, the theory of overpopulation of the planet, the theory of the guilt of "white people" for colonialism, and so on. Thus, in practice, this is expressed in the "positive discrimination" and "call-out culture/cancel culture" of white men, in the discrediting of meat consumption (culinary sects: raw food, veganism, eating insects, etc.), cultural terrorism, the green transition, the policy of reducing childbearing, and so on. In general, modern American communists have borrowed a lot from the ideas of Malthus. The main tool for implementing such an agenda described above was the left-wing globalist media, BigTech and Hollywood. It was assumed that a change in culture and adolescent thinking would eventually lead to a change in the behavior of society as a whole. And thus, eventually, the United States will turn into a tolerant country without whites and Christians, inhabited by a new Creole race professing transhumanism. The main method of opposing Communists to conservatives in the United States today is indirect terrorism. The fact is that, unlike the orthodox Bolshevik Communists, the American Communists do not use terrorism directly. Unlike the same Maoists, they do not kill their opponents en masse. Therefore, the American Communists are trying to inflict as much financial and psychological damage as possible on their opponents. There are many techniques used here. Damage to property, paralyzing the possibility of making a profit, harming cultural objects - vandalism, environmental terrorism, public terrorism, illegal seizure of objects, fake news, culture of cancellation, creating an atmosphere of intolerance to anything, troll raids, DDOS attacks, cyber attacks, leaking personal data to the network, and so on. Each of the above cases requires separate consideration. But in general, American communists are a specific local phenomenon. They often remain misunderstood by their French and German colleagues. I would note, from my point of view, that the only thing that the American left has achieved on the world stage is that representatives of other communist movements "twist their fingers at their temples" when looking at these people. American communism is a unique phenomenon peculiar exclusively to the United States. In general, I have only tried to briefly describe its distinctive features. But in general, we need a special monograph devoted to the analysis of this exotic system of views and values.