URI: 
       # taz.de -- Covid Crisis in India: The Death of Pradeep Bhattacharya
       
       > ‘Why shouldn’t there be a rebellion against the government?’ my uncle
       > asked in a Facebook post. A few days later he died of Covid in New Delhi.
       
   IMG Bild: In his last photograph he is seen sitting on a kerbstone at a Delhi hospital
       
       We seemed to have been trapped in a blizzard of numbers. In addition to
       [1][following the upsurge of COVID cases in India] and the steady increment
       in daily mortality figures, we were trying to keep an eye on the West
       Bengal assembly election results, which were being announced on that day.
       
       The number of seats, the number of votes, the number needed for full
       majority… Then there were the dozens of phone numbers, of oxygen suppliers
       and hospitals, that we had been receiving every few minutes and trying to
       call. ‚The number you are calling is currently busy…‘
       
       Later that night, the only numbers that preoccupied us were the blood
       oxygen saturation levels of my uncle, who was struggling with COVID-induced
       pneumonia at Delhi’s LNJP Hospital. The sequence went something like this:
       85, 60, 50, 45, 70… That final blip, from 45 to 70, raised our hopes. But I
       think my uncle, a rationalist by temperament, would have known, even in his
       diminished state, that 45 to 70 was no improvement at all. The next health
       bulletin said 40.
       
       There was the usual information blackout at night. We had to wait until the
       morning for an update on my uncle’s health. His daughter reached the
       hospital’s help desk early the next day. She was told that the scheduled
       video call with her father would soon be arranged. A couple of hours later,
       I received the news that my uncle had passed away. He had died the previous
       night, at 11.30 p.m. Before I could understand what was happening, the body
       was on its way to the crematorium. No one could attend the funeral.
       
       It’s impossible to mourn such a death—because mourning has to end some day,
       and because this kind of sudden erasure somehow feels different from death.
       The grief that ensues after such a pointless cutting-short of life—not just
       the fact that it happened, but the manner in which it happened—is infinite.
       It never attains closure, not least because the dead can’t even be properly
       memorialized.
       
       ## Infinities of grief
       
       The COVID deaths of the past few weeks have plunged our society, and
       particularly my city, Delhi, into such depthless infinities of grief that I
       don’t think we can ever emerge from this crisis. Even if the political
       leaders directly responsible for it—including Prime Minister Narendra
       Modi—are brought to book. Even if the large-scale fraud and mismanagement
       besetting our health-care and bureaucratic institutions are set right. Even
       if no one else dies gasping for air inside a hospital ward. Nothing can
       reverse the damage that has already been done.
       
       I don’t know if my uncle could have been saved. But I know it for a fact
       that not enough was done to save him. When his SpO2 levels first dropped,
       he was hooked to an oxygen cylinder and rushed to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
       in east Delhi, only to find the hospital gates barricaded. He waited out on
       the streets for four to five hours—with the ambulance meter running and the
       oxygen supply rapidly dwindling—and was then taken to LNJP.
       
       By sheer luck, an oxygen-supported bed was arranged for him at LNJP. But,
       as he soon pointed out over the phone to his daughter, there was a
       conspicuous shortage of medical staff in the ward (a much-ignored aspect of
       the current crisis). The supply of medical oxygen, too, seemed to be
       dangerously fluctuating. One morning, we found that he had been kept off
       oxygen for three to four hours. This was when his condition took a turn for
       the worse.
       
       Not enough was done by the hospital administration to establish a clear
       line of communication with the patient’s family. On one day, my uncle’s
       daughter got a call from his phone, but what she heard on the other end was
       a stranger’s voice. The man said that he was a doctor at LNJP and asked her
       to urgently arrange an ICU bed with ventilator for her father at some other
       hospital. At LNJP, he informed, all the ventilators were taken. This doctor
       could never be traced and was never heard from again. A thousand phone
       calls later, we got to know that my uncle’s name was on the waiting list
       for ventilator beds.
       
       On the night of his death, owing to whatever cruel logic of medical triage,
       he was still on the waiting list. Most likely, at that stage even a
       ventilator would not have saved his life. Still, all this could have been
       clearly conveyed to the family. At the very least, the report of his death
       could have been sent to his daughter at night, rather than revealed in an
       offhand manner at the help desk the following morning.
       
       ## Overburdened and helpless
       
       I am certain that there’s nothing unusual about this particular case. I
       have spent the past few weeks reading and hearing reports of similar
       insensitivity and neglect. And I am privy to the point of view of the
       front-line staff as well (my mother is a nurse in a COVID hospital), seeing
       how overburdened and helpless and vulnerable each one of them is feeling.
       In any case, my intention is not to find someone to blame. At this stage, I
       am doing the only thing that’s left for me to do: learning to mourn the
       old-fashioned way, through remembrance.
       
       Memory has a role to play here. Pradeep Bhattacharya, my uncle—Fufa, as I
       called him—was central to some of my earliest memories. These memories go
       so far back in time that I don’ t have any real recollections associated
       with them. What I have instead is something more substantial: a visual
       record in the form of the many photographs Fufa took of me as a toddler. He
       himself developed these photos in a darkroom.
       
       I am told that when I was born—at the same hospital Fufa breathed his last
       in—he greeted my arrival in this world by presenting to my parents a cake
       that had 'Welcome Tintin’ written on it. Tintin was the provisional name he
       had come up with—possibly because I resembled the comic-book character in
       what I imagine to be my expression of wide-eyed wonderment. If I remember
       correctly, we still have the photograph of that cake.
       
       Fufa was my only bond with that long-forgotten part of my childhood. Every
       time I met him over the past decade or so, he would invariably take me to
       those innocent years, and tease me with anecdotes that portrayed
       me—deservedly, I am sure—as a foolish little bungler. 'Kyun, bahut phudak
       rahe ho miyan? (You have put on such airs!) I have known you since you were
       this small,’ he would say and perform his mimicry routine of me as an
       eight-year-old, crying and demanding, with a puerile sense of entitlement,
       to be carried home. Nobody else in my immediate circle remembers me as that
       kid, or at least nobody has instant access to those memories. Fufa, the
       chronicler of my childhood, was the only bridge to that phase of my life
       which is now forever lost to me.
       
       He was also the first person in my social circle I wanted to write about.
       During our conversations—and it was mostly just him talking throughout as I
       listened, attempting to get a word in edgeways—I would take mental notes,
       saying to myself, 'I must remember this, I must write it down.’ And I did
       write it down. Many years ago, he offered an unforgettable metaphor to
       explain how Marx’s ideas were different from Hegel’s. He said, 'Hegel was
       standing upside down; Marx turned him the right way up.’
       
       ## He was his own master
       
       Fufa was a teacher of Marxism. Yet he never regarded Marxist theory with
       any degree of academic detachment. Indeed, enacting those ideas in his own
       life, as best he could, was among his many projects. For him, the personal
       was the political, and one manifestation of that Marxist 'self-realization’
       was his fierce, uncompromising individualism.
       
       As Marx wrote, 'A being does not regard himself as independent unless he is
       his own master, and he is only his own master when he owes his existence to
       himself.’ Throughout his life, Fufa owed his existence to no man but
       himself. Perhaps for this reason, he abided by a kind of renunciatory
       ethos, rejecting most of the comforts of life, refusing to participate in
       any form of self-advancement.
       
       Perhaps for this reason, he never got around to putting together a 'body of
       work’. His decades-long collection of photographs remains largely unseen.
       He never bothered to share his lectures or published articles with anyone.
       The work he did in creating a syndicated science page for Indian
       newspapers, possibly the first and only such endeavour in India, is now
       forgotten. The radio play he made on one of Premchand’s stories has
       vanished from the airwaves.
       
       Until around a generation ago, it was possible in this country to choose to
       live on one’s own terms. To choose a life of respectable, austere poverty
       over vulgar consumerism; eccentricity over the norm; individual expression
       over herd sentiment. Fufa was an embodiment of that alternative style of
       living. But he and his ilk were increasingly marginalized in the 'New
       India’, to the extent that they woke up one day and realized that they had
       lost all social and political relevance. They realized that they were
       utterly helpless against the forces of the market.
       
       Over the last few years, I saw very little of him. We had grown apart,
       partly because I was myself busy surrendering to some of those forces,
       giving in to middle-class comforts and careerist ways, effectively
       suppressing my urge to drift and dream, taking the path opposite to the one
       he had taken. I sometimes wonder if this was because I didn’t want to end
       up like him. Or maybe because I understood that I didn’t have his moral
       courage, something that kept him going.
       
       The other thing that kept him going was talking. More than anything else,
       he liked to talk and, as was often the case, argue—always loudly, with
       conviction and animation. When I remember him, I first hear his voice, with
       its booming clarity, resonating across a distance. He almost always spoke
       at the top of his voice. And his appearance—particularly that heavy beard,
       more Tolstoy than Tagore—added more weight to the voice.
       
       ## Victims of the government
       
       The last I heard from him was a few months ago. He spoke about the pandemic
       and said that it was important that we not let it dominate our intellectual
       life: 'We have to think about other things too. The minds of a lot of
       people have just shrunk, you see. They have become too introverted. What we
       need in these times is for people to reach out and talk to others.’
       
       Social media was one of the tools he used to reach out, to keep himself
       sane, to vent his anger. His last Facebook post, from 22 April, reads,
       'When a good-for-nothing, remorseless and evil government crosses all
       limits of indecency, why shouldn’t there be a rebellion?’ He would have
       enjoyed the Bengal election results, I remember thinking on the day of his
       death. He would have relished the humiliating loss suffered by the BJP in
       the state he had his roots in. But he had already joined the ranks of the
       thousands of victims of the BJP government, helpless and speechless in
       their suffocation.
       
       In his last photograph, taken by his son, he is seen sitting on a kerbstone
       at a Delhi hospital, breathing through a mask. An oxygen cylinder is on his
       left, and on his right is an old shopping bag that says 'Reliance Trends’.
       (That symbolism of the shopping bag is what I find particularly
       disturbing—how it militated against everything he stood for.) The bag is
       filled with the things he carried, the things he thought he would need for
       his hospital stay. He has a disoriented, weary look on his face—the look of
       someone who is trying to make sense of the world and has nothing left to
       say.
       
       19 May 2021
       
       ## LINKS
       
   DIR [1] /Pandemie-in-Indien/!5767585
       
       ## AUTOREN
       
   DIR Vineet Gill
       
       ## TAGS
       
   DIR Schwerpunkt Coronavirus
   DIR Indien
   DIR BJP
   DIR Pandemie
   DIR taz international
   DIR Indien
   DIR Schwerpunkt Coronavirus
   DIR Schwerpunkt Coronavirus
       
       ## ARTIKEL ZUM THEMA
       
   DIR Nach Wahlen im indischen Kerala: Die Virenjägerin muss gehen
       
       Als Gesundheitsministerin im Bundesstaat Kerala ist K.K. Shailaja in ganz
       Indien beliebt. Trotz jüngstem Wahlerfolg gibt sie nun ihr Amt auf.
       
   DIR Pandemie in Indien: Im Ganges treiben Coronatote
       
       In Indien breitet sich die Coronapandemie auf dem Land weiter mit Wucht
       aus. Manchen Familien fehlen die Mittel für eine Bestattung ihrer Toten.
       
   DIR Corona in Indien: Der Tod des Pradeep Bhattacharya
       
       „Warum soll es keinen Aufstand geben?“, fragte der Onkel im Facebook-Post.
       Die vielen Covidtoten stürzen die indische Gesellschaft in Verzweiflung.