URI: 
       NSFW, or better, Not Suitable For Offices
       
       June 2025 · 4 minute read
       Posted in:  NSFW, Not Suitable For Offices,
       
       "But  your tag-"  Yep... Mostly used  by internet conventions. I don't
       want  to  jumpscare  anyone,  and  we  need  to use  common  terms  to
       understand each other. Also, it works both in Spanish and English.
       
       
       
       But I don't like "Not Safe For Work"
       
       
       That's  why  I  added the tag "Not  Suitable For  Offices" to make the
       point. (It is used only here because it is my first post  Not Suitable
       For Offices in English tho. Older posts are in Spanish)
       
       It  is not perfect, there are office jobs that deal  with that content
       daily (police  come to mind,  regarding  what they see and do). But at
       least it evokes  the enviroment in  a  explicit  way  that  NSFW  does
       implicitly.
       
       I get its objective tho
       
       
       It is just  a content warning (CW), so you don't open stuff while  you
       are  working  that  could get  you   fired.  Almost  always  (at least
       locally), it is used for porn. "Here's porn, don't click while  you're
       on your job, keep working, wait untill you are home".
       
       It can be used for violent and/or sexual not-porn content too, because
       you can also get fired  with those. It is one of the most generic CWs.
       I always agree  with CWs  as a  concept.  If you wanna  see, you  keep
       going, else, you can skip something triggering or inconvenient.
       
       But I don't like it.
       
       Why?
       
       
       Not suitable, for what?
       
       
       Truth is, most of this point is related to  many jobs erasure. Lots of
       jobs deal with violent and/or sexual content  and themes, permamently.
       And society treats these workers pretty bad already.
       
       Examples:
       
       - A  lot of social workers  need  to help  people  in awful  conditions.
         Their life stories would have a paragraph full of  just  CWs. In other
         words, with the common use, their lifes are NSFW.
       
       - Social media moderators. Many times, they literally  have  to see NSFW
         content  to  work.  How else  will  they  act? You can't  take actions
         without  knowing what are you  dealing with.  You  can't (or at  least
         shouldn't) use an automatic ban-hammer.
       
       - Artists by  commision. That  fetishistic  furry patrons  meme has some
         truth. Some people indeed  make a living doing that. Not  all artists,
         but many do.  (If you are interested  in commisioning that content  to
         an  artist, remember  to  check their terms of service  BEFORE talking
         to them. Make sure they offer  that kind  of product BEFORE asking. Be
         respectful!)
       
       - Sex workers.  The obvious example. It  is  an ample category. (Did you
         know that stuff I mentioned regarding artists algo applies here?)
       
       TL;DR: Something  situable in one job is not in other  one,  and  NSFW
       always assumes an office job. It is important to visibilize vulnerable
       workers.
       
       Ambiguity
       
       
       Many  use NSFW as the  only CW. While it is  mainly used for  porn, it
       covers a lot. If  you have  a delicate stomach you may have decided to
       skip anything tagged like  that (if it  is your case, thanks for  your
       trust!).
       
       NSFW can go  from  a woman  breastfeeding her baby to a violent street
       attack. It will avoid to get you fired, but that may not be enough for
       you.
       
       My side of the fediverse got me  used to (/positive) CWs. The ideal is
       a tagging system, like multiple Boorus' implementations. But it is not
       possible in all platforms, for technical and/or cultural reasons.
       
       Not Safe For Work would be better for bad practices warnings
       
       
       This is a lighter  subject, pero I THINK NSFW SHOULD  BE  USED ON THIS
       STUFF INSTEAD:
       
   IMG Photo of a man using other man as a table, so he can cut a board with a buzz saw
       
       - Short and easy to remember acronym.
       - Memeable.
       - Gets to the point. It is not safe, stop it.
       - Following security standards is important.
       
       It's hard this changes, tho
       
       So, as  a  treat,  I just  share my thoughts in  this  post.  Food for
       thought.
       
       In case someone is  thinking funny stuff, this is not a excuse for you
       to evade your  responsibilities!  🫵  Remember  to  be responsible  and
       considerate in your job, people are counting on you! When you are done
       with your assignated tasks you can play your gacha game.
       Secciones:
   DIR Home
   DIR Posts (Feed)
   DIR Casa
       
       Links:
  HTML Mail
       
   DIR Home
       
        skrlet13 CC-BY-SA para posts
       ___________________________________________________________________
                       Gophered by Gophernicus/3.1.1 on OpenBSD/amd64 7.7