Subj : Re: No routing of point addresses. To : Alan Ianson From : Marc Lewis Date : Wed Oct 28 2020 08:49 pm Hello Alan. > I have had to change my netmail routing to another node that doesn't > exhibit this aberrant behaviour. AI> I haven't looked at the input .pkt so here is my guess. > Any views on this? AI> Was the packet addressed to 1:261/38? The packet header I mean. The AI> messages within the packet could have been echomail or netmail AI> addressed to any node and those message will be forwarded on as AI> usual. The mail bundle was addressed to 261/38 for forwarding purposes. The packet would have been addressed to 2:333/808.7. In yet another case the mail bundle was again addressed to 1:261/38 and the packet would have been addressed to 2:221/360. Those two were never delivered until I resent them to a different node with international connections and a different tosser. Those were promptly delivered to their destinations by whatever group of intervening nodes. [snip] AI> If that packet was addressed to 1:261/38 (the packet, not the AI> messages inside) the tosser there will likely act on it as needed. If by packet you actually mean the mail bundle, then yes the affected bundles went to 1:261/38. Best regards, Marc --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+ * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45) .