Subj : Re: EU rejects claims of
To   : RUG RAT
From : Mike Powell
Date : Sun Aug 31 2025 09:47 am

> more in criminal cases.  Expanded in the early 20s to make taking pictures of
> "women" in swim suits at a public beach. Making it a sex crime if you being
> there with a camera made them feel uncomfortable.  Penalties include large
> fines, jail, and or chemical castration.

Beaches are a good place to take pictures of many other things... lighthouses,
sunsets... that have nothing to do with whoever is there.  I usually try to
ignore other people... being tagged for a sex crime just because my camera
makes them uncomfortable is going way too far.

> "Defamation using truth".  Speaking ill of someone, even if true can lead to
> large fines and jail.

So if they do something bad, and you just tell what they did without
opinion, it could be defamation?  Consider the state of things right now, I
am surprised we don't have one like this.

> A lot of these laws do nothing to protect the public but are used by the
> business conglomarates (Chibol), or government officals to hide their dirty
> business in the shawdows, or stifle public commnet.

Figures.

Mike

 * SLMR 2.1a * Anything good is either illegal, immoral or fattening.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

.