Subj : Should EMulation....
To   : Hax0r
From : Tinman
Date : Thu Jun 08 2000 03:30 pm

RE: Should EMulation....
BY: Hax0r to Tinman on Thu Jun 08 2000 10:25 pm

 > RE: Should EMulation....
 > BY: Tinman to Hax0r on Wed Jun 07 2000 10:16 pm
 > 
 >  >  Legaly (some law that thay mentioned pertaining to ownership) outlines t
 >  > the consumer must be presented with any legalities conserning a product B
 >  > the purchase is made, if the consumer is allowed to purchase an item with
 >  > agreeing to any conditions befor the monitary transaction takes place, th
 >  > item's manufacutur cannot enforce any new  conditions because the consume
 >  > already the owner of the product.
 > 
 > heh, thats actually kind of interesting...I think I would find much enjoymen
 > if I picked up a software box and it had the following label on it:
 > 
 > "SPA & BSA WARNING: Purchase of Computer Software causes cancer of the walle
 > and strips you of your constitutional right of private ownership."
 > 
 > Seriously, how can they ever hope to enforce a software license agreement?
 > 

 It is put there as a scair tactic, to give them that initial edge over 99.8%
of the poeple who "break the agreement", but as rob pointed out that is
differant then a copyright infrindgement which is something that is enforcable
even without an agreement.

ú.'útinmanú'.ú

.