Subj : Re: A packet format question
To   : LARS KELLOGG-STEDMAN
From : BEN RITCHEY
Date : Thu Mar 10 2011 07:09 am

* An ongoing debate between Lars Kellogg-Stedman and All rages on ...

| LS> Suggesting that either the final message body is missing a NUL or the
| LS> end-of-packet marker is incorrect.  In your opinion: is this permitted
| LS> by FTS-0001?  This question is of mostly academic interest, since the

Yes and no, matter of interpretation. :) Mostly no as three null bytes are
usually used, though what else could a second null be, and why 3? {g}

--
Be well    :^)

 : Ben   aka cMech    http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/m/cmech617/
 :
 +    WildCat! Board 24/7  +1-337-984-4794  any BAUD 8,N,1
--- GoldEd+/DOS v1.1.5cM
 * Origin: FIDONet - The Positronium Repository (1:393/68)

.