Subj : Re: Yet another 2oFB apology. :/
To   : apam
From : paulie420
Date : Mon Nov 03 2025 05:56 pm

 ap> Maybe the oneliners needs to be strengthened a bit to validate the from
 ap> field with who the message is actually from? I don't know who wrote the
 ap> original mystic mod (i think it might have been gryphon?), but I think it
 ap> would be fairly easy to do and maintain backward compatability.

The IBBS Last Callers mod, by xqtr, uses much better obfuscation - I think base64, knowing xqtr... but not sure. 

IBBS one-liners could be better by not using clear text; but none of that matters if BBSes use proper security - that 2oFB was NOT doing - so I'd mentioned updating the fsxNet infopack [Unless it already discusses this and I simply DIDN'T implement security correctly...] so that new sysOps made sure to secure their BBSes so these instances never happened...

At any rate, I'm just some nerd trying - and with the traffic I've been gifted, some bad actors will always find the flaws. :/



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbs>>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (21:2/150)

.