Subj : Is binkp/d's security model kaputt?
To   : Digital Man
From : apam
Date : Sat Jan 01 2022 03:54 pm

 > It's always possible that a network could be formed (or switch to) a
 > non-FTN technoloy. And that could then be a new technology. But so
 > far, 

Yes, it would have to offer something FTN doesn't though I think, even if
it was technically superior, FTN does work and I suspect unless both
Synchronet and Mystic supported it natively, very few would be bothered
to set it up.

 > I haven't found any limitation or issue with QWK that I couldn't
 > address, so that's where I tend to focus my
 > message-networking-innovation. I appreciate your adopting (and testing
 > the interoperability) of some of my QWKnet extensions too.

That's cool, I mainly just wanted messages from talisman to be a bit more
seemless for those viewing on synchronet (so people didn't get mad lol)
but I'm glad it was helpful to test things.

 > Thanks. It's still the 31st here in California, so still my birthday
 > (the Unix epoch, for this timezone anyway). :-)

Ah, ok. That's interesting. So facebook must tell me it's peoples
birthdays in my own timezone not theirs.

Sorry, I don't mean to be a bit of a downer regarding message nets - I'm
not sure if it's coming across that way.

Andrew

--
|03Andrew Pamment |08(|11apam|08)
|13Happy|10Land |14v2.0|08!|07


--- Talisman v0.35-dev (Windows/x64)
 * Origin: The Grinning Cat - telnet://gcat.talismanbbs.com:11823 (21:1/151)

.