Subj : Re: FTSC participation
To   : Mark Lewis
From : Nick Andre
Date : Wed Nov 15 2017 02:53 pm

On 15 Nov 17  07:14:08, Mark Lewis said the following to Ward Dossche:

ML>  ml>> interesting... i wonder who that was? is it any less bad that one of
ML>  ml>> the candidates has threatened to DDoS other FTN systems off the 'net
ML>  ml>> if they attempt to provide certain services or other communications
ML>  ml>> methods??
ML> 
ML>  WD> Name names, show proof or shut up.
ML> 
ML> done... extraneous verbiage [CHOMP]ed out for brevity...

Alexey is just a silly Russian kidding around and for him or someone of his 
skillset to DDOS another Fido system would be a waste of time and talent.

No different than Benny talking to me in Bash-language when I ask him if he 
masturbates to his pirated copy of The Matrix.

I've also heard from certain FTSC candidates how unreliable, buggy or a "mail
catastrophe waiting to happen" my software is, yet, nobody has the conjones 
or brains to conjure up proof.

I see candidates running who I will bet cannot explain how a mailer or 
nodelist compiler works, or why certain FTSC documents are written the way
they are. I challenge all those running to answer a highly technical FTSC
"exam" if such would exist. The kind of answers one cannot easily Google.

Nick

--- Renegade vY2Ka2
 * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)

.