Subj : Question on FTS-0001
To   : deon
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Tue Oct 17 2023 11:24 pm

  Re: Question on FTS-0001
  By: deon to Rob Swindell on Tue Oct 17 2023 08:59 am

 >   Re: Question on FTS-0001
 >   By: Rob Swindell to Andrew Leary on Sun Oct 15 2023 02:03 pm
 >
 >  > FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. If any FTSC doc needed "correction"
 >  > (I'd say "clarification") in this regard, it'd be FTS-4.
 >
 > I'd disagree.

The norm/rules for netmail and echomail are different.

 > The question that I started was (and I'll paraphrase) what was the
 > origNet/origNode represent in a packed message header.
 >
 > The answers I've seen are:
 > * Its the source message address,
 > * Its the last hop's address
 >
 > It should be known as one or the other.
 >
 > The english description "orig..." implies it is from the source of the
 > message, ie: the originator, but convention seems to be that it represents
 > the last hop.
 >
 > That should be clarified and updated.

FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. You can wish it did, but it just doesn't.
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #47:
He said he'll break my legs, he meant It... he gave me the dead mackerel eyes.
Norco, CA WX: 67.0øF, 70.0% humidity, 0 mph N wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

.