Subj : Zoom anyone? To : Borax Man From : Richard Menedetter Date : Sun May 03 2020 07:26 pm Hi Borax! 03 May 2020 07:20, from Borax Man -> Richard Menedetter: RM>> They ARE designed for it for a long time. BM> Yes, for a long time this mistake has festered. We agree to disagree :) BM> The issue is that we are reimplementing gui elements over HTTP, and BM> this has meant having to bolt on functionality. I used to use quite a BM> few web based apps at work, now none. What used to be a web based apps BM> is now dedicated client programs using a crossplatform toolkit like BM> QT. I did not mean that it is the best solution for everything. But there are a lot of really, really good usecases. BM> We will continue to see complex websites, such as YouTube, Jitsi, BM> there will always be rich web portals, but we will see fewer BM> applications unrelated to a website using browsers. I do not know. 99% of the programs I use privately are browser and terminal. I used to use a specialized mailclient, now I use webmail. RM>> For example ChromeOS runs all its apps in the browser. RM>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrome_OS BM> Is it a proper OS, or an appliance? I do not use it, so I am not that familiar. But it seems that it is a small linux system, where linux is hidden, and the only shell is the browser. It is used to view webpages and to run applications. BM> What I was referring to are things like web based Material Resource BM> Management programs, Quality Management programs and other enterprise BM> applications. At work we have a lot of webapps. Most of them are not very well made. But usually because they did not put in a lot of effort, or they used really bad SAP Webthingy (whatever that is called.) But naturally I agree that huge specialized applications can be better optimized if they are local apps. But something like this is still extremely powerful: https://www.freephototool.com/ CU, Ricsi .... It is better to have a permanent income that to be fascinating. --- GoldED+/LNX * Origin: A friend is someone who knows me and likes me anyway. (2:310/31) .