Subj : MBSE Latest
To   : All
From : Rj Clay
Date : Sun Apr 07 2013 07:21 pm

Hi All!

12 Jan 13 15:20, I wrote to Robert Wolfe:

 RC> mbsebbs_0.92.0+111209-1ppa1~precise1

  And note that I'm still using primary package version numbers like 
"0.92.0+111209" instead of "0.95.14" (which is what that one is) because I 
still haven't heard how the versioning is going to go.  IIRC; even version 
numbers were for stable releases and odd version numbers were for develpment 
versions.  That's fine except that they weren't in sequence;  0.93.x was used 
to develop 0.92.0 instead of 0.91.x as I would expect.

  Personally, I think v0.94.0 should should be just skipped and some kind of 
note as to why added to the ChangeLog (or some kind of v0.94 release could be 
done but still continue with 0.95.x as the current development leading to a 
v0.96.0 release).  That way, v0.95.x development versions can lead to a stable 
v0.96.0, which makes more sense.


Jame


--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5--b20111217
 * Origin: RJC eeePC (1:120/419)

.