Subj : socket.recvline() and file_utime()
To   : Digital Man
From : MCMLXXIX
Date : Fri Mar 12 2010 09:51 am

  Re: socket.recvline() and file_utime()
  By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Thu Mar 11 2010 15:12:08

 >   Re: socket.recvline() and file_utime()
 >   By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Thu Mar 11 2010 01:22 pm
 > 
 >  > file_touch("test.txt");
 >  > log("original mod_time: " + file_date("test.txt"));
 >  > log("changing file mod_time to 1267455497");
 >  > file_utime("test.txt",1267455497,1267455497);
 >  > log("new file mod_time: " + file_date("test.txt"));
 >  > file_remove("test.txt");
 >  >
 >  > OUTPUT:
 >  >
 >  >   3/11  01:10:51p  Node 1 original mod_time: 1268331052
 >  >   3/11  01:10:51p  Node 1 changing file mod_time to 1267455497
 >  >   3/11  01:10:51p  Node 1 new file mod_time: 1267455498
 >  >
 >  > It's driving me insane.. doesn't make sense
 > 
 > What filesystem is "test.txt" being stored on? Some filesystems (e.g. FAT,
 > FAT32) only support 2-second granularity for file date/times.
 > 
 > Here's a Microsoft article on the subject:
 > 
 > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724290%28VS.85%29.aspx
 > 
 > 
 >  > ----------------------------------------------------
 >  >
 >  > var sock=new Socket();
 >  > sock.bind(10088);
 > 
 > Don't bind specific port numbers for outbound connections (as we discussed).
 > 
 >  > sock.connect("localhost",25);
 >  > log(time());
 >  > log("connected: " + sock.is_connected);
 >  > log("nonblocking: " + sock.nonblocking);
 >  >
 >  > OUTPUT:
 >  >
 >  >   3/11  01:19:09p  Node 2 1268331549
 >  >   3/11  01:19:09p  Node 2 connected: true
 >  >   3/11  01:19:09p  Node 2 nonblocking: false
 >  >   3/11  01:19:10p  Node 2 null
 >  >   3/11  01:19:10p  Node 2 1268331550
 >  >
 >  > -------------------------
 >  > also driving me insane..
 >  >
 >  > does anyone have an insight on these things?
 >  >
 >  > unless I'm missing something, the sock.recvline() should wait 10 seconds
 >  > before moving on, but it doesnt.
 > 
 > I guess you didn't paste all your code - there was no call to recvline() the
 > 
 >                                             digital man
 > 
 
turns out I was wrong anyway.. surprise surprise!
 though I still can't duplicate that actual example. I swear it happened 



---
 þ Synchronet þ The BRoKEN BuBBLE (MDJ.ATH.CX)

.