Subj : services
To   : Digital Man
From : Mcmlxxix
Date : Fri Oct 09 2009 07:06 pm

  Re: services
  By: Digital Man to Mcmlxxix on Thu Oct 08 2009 10:59 pm

 > Um, I just wrote that "documentation" in the post. :-) Think of it like a
 > Wiki. :-)
 >

well it was so neatly printed, I figured you cut and pasted it. It made me
panic, since that last thing I want to be is another Phil.

 > You could have dynamic service instances communicate with eachother as well
 > (using Queues, Sockets, or disk I/O). You don't *have* to use a static
 > service.

well, it seems that would be more of a hacky way of doing it. I've done enough
things the "less right" way, so I'd like to avoid that if I can. It's starting
to look more and more like I should try to work this all into qengine.js and
run it as a static service, since that wuold keep everything together a lot
better.

I've got a hell of a lot of code in chateng.js and qengine.js already, so if
I've done something the wrong way it's going to suck a major set of balls to
have to rework everything.


---
 þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS (All the cool SysOps run STOCK!)

.