Subj : Re: zone 4 ping To : Ward Dossche From : Dan Clough Date : Tue Mar 19 2024 07:39 pm -=> Ward Dossche wrote to Fernando Toledo <=- FT> Unfortunately in the Z4 they are all inert. Nobody has an interest in FT> improving something, or at least keeping the current thing working well. FT> The ZC hasn't changed anything for 10 years and no one changes to the ZC FT> =( WD> If you are of the opinion that change is overdue, then now is as WD> good a time as ever to initiate change. There was talk quite recently about this, and somebody... seemed to imply that it wasn't possible, or that it "hadn't been long enough" that the existing ZC was AWOL... WD> If you are dissatisfied and of the belief that another ZC could WD> do a better job, then get the ball rolling. But there is a WD> challenge: an impeachment procedure of a zone-coordinator has WD> never been attempted that I know of. Plus in Z4 there are 4 WD> listed RCs of which 2 are absent. Of the remaining 2 which are WD> technically functional one is the ZC himself so unless he votes WD> against himself provided he wakes up, then I fear the chances of WD> achieving it are close to nothing. If there are only 2 RCs left, doesn't 1 of them make a majority/quorum? It's my opinion that it does. With the circumstances thrown in (obvious neglect / disappearance), it pretty much is beyond question. WD> Another possibility is to create one or several IP-only orphan WD> nets and have these accomodated in a region in another zone. Talk WD> to the International Coordinator about this and see how he feels WD> about that. Okay, let's do that. Wave the magic wand, dissolve Z4, and put the survivors in Z3, with Fernando as the RC. Done. .... Hard work never killed anyone but why take a risk? === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115) .