URI: 
       tMerge branch 'master' of git.z3bra.org:wendy - wendy - watch files/directories and run commands on any event
  HTML git clone git://z3bra.org/wendy
   DIR Log
   DIR Files
   DIR Refs
   DIR README
   DIR LICENSE
       ---
   DIR commit bdb6607a79f68266c32227b5f4948f945265dfad
   DIR parent 555a55c468d7289bcb463170e16566306206091c
  HTML Author: z3bra <willy@mailoo.org>
       Date:   Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:11:31 +0200
       
       Merge branch 'master' of git.z3bra.org:wendy
       
       Diffstat:
         M README                              |      82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
       
       1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
       ---
   DIR diff --git a/README b/README
       t@@ -54,3 +54,85 @@ Here are some examples:
        
            # Get up to date with community based projects
            wendy -D -M -C -d /mnt/nfs/project/ -t 30 -e notify-send 'project updated'
       +
       +
       +FAQ
       +===
       +
       +> Can it work on a folder and sub folders ?
       +
       +It does not. inotify does not handle this by default, and implementing this
       +would make the code grow in complexity to a level I don't want to reach.
       +But you could do something like:
       +
       +    $ tree
       +    .
       +    └── a
       +    ├── b
       +    │   ├── c
       +    │   └── d
       +    └── e
       +
       +    5 directories, 0 files
       +
       +    $ for d in `find a -type d`; do
       +    >    wendy -C -q -f $d -e echo file created in $d &
       +    > done
       +
       +That will spawn one instance of wendy per directory. You could then kill them
       +all using job control or with
       +
       +    killall wendy
       +
       +---
       +
       +> Can you explain why this exists? Doesn't inotifywait (from inotify-tools) do
       +> this exact same thing?
       +
       +When I first started wendy, I was not aware of inotifywait. It was just a good
       +programming exercise.
       +
       +With the time, I found wendy more and more useful, and added a few options to
       +make it faster and more 'generic' (It was first created to watch my mail
       +directory, to alert me of new mails).
       +
       +Today, I know that inotifywait can be used for everything wendy does Anyway, I
       +still prefer using wendy because of this:
       +
       +    * inotifywait exits upon event reception [1]
       +    * inotifywait does not allow to launch a command on event reception [2]
       +    * inotifywait with multiple events can end in an infinite line [3]
       +    * inotifywait only handle the file modification event (eg, wendy can use
       +      the IN_ONLYDIR mask).
       +    * inotifywait exits right when an event occur, wendy can treat all queued
       +      events at a specific period
       +    * inotify-tools : 164kb against 12kb for wendy (ok, not that relevant)
       +    * I like the name 'wendy' better
       +
       +[1] I'm aware of the '--monitor' flag, but the only way to exec a command with
       +this is a pain that implies read, a while loop and so on.
       +
       +[2] In fact, you can, by doing "inotifywait -e <event> && command", and
       +wrapping it in a while loop. Well, don't forget to add a test to see if your
       +file still exists, to avoid infinite buggy loops. You'll end up with something
       +like:
       +
       +    while test -e ~/path/to/my/file; do
       +        inotifywait -e <event> ~/path/to/my/file && command
       +    done
       +
       +Good luck with this, I prefer "wendy -m <mask> -e command"
       +
       +[3] one flag per event. events written in words:
       +
       +    inotifywait -e access -e create -e delete -e modify -e attrib /path/to/file
       +
       +I prefer
       +
       +        wendy -m 774 ~/path/to/my/file
       +
       +---
       +
       +> Would you prefer to fight one horse sized duck, or 10 duck sized horses ?
       +
       +Regarding size and number, I'd rather fight horses. Ducks are silly creatures.